Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Course Reflection

Leticia Rivera
Pro. Matyakubova
English 210
November 8th, 2016
Final Reflection
The Fall semester of 2016 is nearly finished, and various tasks were completed and submitted. Each assignment was submitted with the hope that I showed my best ability in writing, as well as show my capabilities of following instructions to complete each task. This semester with my English course was special, for reasons that I was able to explore subjects I was interested in. In the past, I have taken various science courses, which focuses on research, and discussing researchers findings, but in this course I was able to be the researcher.
In the beginning of the course, I was assigned two small task such as the memorandum and the formal letter of introduction. The reason why I stated “small task” is because it was just one page long and the amount of time dedicated was not large. These assignments was to be able to slowly get an idea of what writing assignments require and to show our ability to the professor as the semester proceeded. The formal letter of introduction required information on my literacy background and goals in reference of writing. The memorandum assignment required me to discuss an issue that concerned me and professionally address it in writing. I decided to speak about an issue my college institution City College of New York was currently in, which was about low amount of available math tutors. As a student who is constantly in need of math tutoring, it was an issue to consider. These two assignments allowed me to refresh my writing abilities, in order to continue with the course.
The following assignment was an informative report, which held an objective stance. This assignment allowed me to practice on my source use, such as being able to evaluate, paraphrase and cite my sources. For the report, I chose to speak on the pros and cons of plastic surgery and only state relevant information, not my opinions. Eventually, I created an argumentative report on reasons why euthanasia should not be legal. This assignment helped me learn the technique to formulate and articulate a stance through and in my writing. Before the argumentative paper was due, I was able to spend time on perfecting myself in sentence structure with the class.
Lastly, the most significant assignment of this course was the final research paper. This assignment is designed to incorporate the previous assignments because there were informative aspects, argumentative points and is dependable on sources in order to create the research paper. This final assignment was about research on the impact the ivory trade has brought onto elephants in Africa. The research paper approached all the learning objectives for this class because drafting, engaging in writing processes, engaging in genre analysis, formulating a stance and using resources was each incorporated as I complete the assignment.
Overall, this course was exceptionally engaging and valuable. My professor was very helpful to the class with our writing because she took the time to guide the class as writers to each individually be creative writers, but also to pay attention to grammar, sentence structures and citing properly. This english class worked together to progress because there was so much interaction between students in peer reviews, group works and even presentations. The success of this course happened as a group, which makes this class amazing.



Friday, December 9, 2016

final research paper on ivory trade & elephants

Leticia Rivera
English 21003
Prof Matyakubova
Dec 8th, 2016

Abstract

            A dramatic decrease of elephant creates concern, as the Ivory trade continues to rave in Africa. Since the ivory trade threatens the future of African elephants, it is important to indicate why elephants need to be saved, who should save them and how to they can be saved.
Elephants need to be saved is because they are important to the African savannah and play a distinct role in the survival of other animals. Additionally, the rate of elephant population growth is gradual and will require decades of recovery from poaching, which is why they need to be saved. Saving elephants have become a major task for some wildlife organizations around the world. Spreading the word about the dangers elephants face can assist in demand reduction of ivory throughout the world.









Poaching Gone Wrong:
The impact of the Ivory Trade and the Pursuit to Save Elephants

Every child in the process of learning the names of animals is always taught to learn the word elephant. What if one day books, and parents no longer teach children the animal elephant, because they are extinct. On average, an elephant is killed every 15 minutes (Nast). Elephants are traditionally recognized to come from Africa and Asia. In the wild, an elephant can live between 50 - 70 years. The word “elephant” can be traced back to ancient times, and the meaning of the word is ivory. They enjoy swimming, and also drink a great deal of water. In fact, an elephant can drink almost 15 quarts (14 liters) at one time. Their diet consists of eating an assortment of plants. They search for food nearly 16 hours each day, and can eat between 300 - 600 pounds of food each day. Their tusk can grow to an impressive length of 10 feet, and weigh nearly 200 pounds (Davidson 30). In 1800, around 26 million elephants are estimates too have roamed Africa (Larson). The ivory trade has put African elephant populations at risk.
In the early 1900’s shooting an elephant in the safari was the height of manliness for the wealthy westerners. Mass productions of combs, brush handles, pool balls and piano keys was fueling in ivory frenzy. By 1913, the United States was consuming 200 tons of ivory per year and African elephants have dropped to an estimated 10 million. World appetite for ivory continue to decimate elephant herds until by 1979 only 1.3 million were left. Even as many westerners realized the consequence of the trade, Asian demand picked up. By 1989, elephants numbered only six hundred thousand. A worldwide ban on ivory sales in 1989 led to a rebound in the population, to about a million. But in 1999 and 2008, due to pressure from countries in Asia and southern Africa, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) allowed two sanctioned sales of ivory (Larson). In spite of the international trade ban, illegal trade continues. Elephant poaching is a significant problem in many parts of Africa. Since the
ivory trade threatens the future of African elephants, it is important to indicate why elephants need to be saved, who should save them and how to they can be saved.
An initial reason why elephants need to be saved is because they are important to the African savannah and play a distinct role in the growth of grasses, and trees. There are some parts of the savannah that receive little to no rain per year, whereas there are other parts of the savannah that receives high levels of rain. As Rudi J Van Aarde states in a booklet Elephant Facts and Fables, elephants “often dominate the herbivore guild in savannahs and consequently play a major role in modifying the structure and function of these landscapes. Their feeding on trees alters canopy shape as well as the survival of saplings [(a young tree)] and adult trees, thereby ensuring micro-scale environmental conditions that allow grasses and trees to co-exist. These changes and the absence of elephants may favour bush encroachment. This may disadvantage herbivores that feed on sun-loving grasses and sedges”. Since elephants are involved in the continued pathways of food for other herbivores other than themselves, they play an important part of savannahs.
            In addition to contributing to the food source for other animals, these mammals also play a role in obtaining water during a rough time of the year in the savannah. The dry season in the savannah can last from three to nine months. Therefore, during the dry season, elephants use their tusks to dig for water. This not only allows the elephants to survive in dry environments and when droughts strike, but also provides water for other animals that share harsh habitats (Save the Elephants). No matter the size of any animal, food and water is a substantial possession for survival. Elephants provide the opportunity for smaller animals and plants to survive.
            Additionally, the rate of elephant population growth is gradual and will require decades of recovery from poaching, which is why they need to be saved. During a study on elephant birth rates, Andrea K. Turkalo, Peter H. Wrege, and George Wittemyer gathered relevant results such as the following:
Using 23 years of individually based demographic data from Dzanga, Central African Republic, we found low reproductive potential resulting from annual birth rates averaging 4·3% (SD: 1·4%), a median inter-birth interval of 68 months and a median primiparous age of 23 years. Average mortality was 3·1% per year (SD: 1·0%) during the study, with approximately 1·4% of that attributed to human killing (1).
This study manifests the failing of population growth of elephants as a result of the ivory trade. A female elephant has a gestation period of nearly two years and are ready to breed when they are about 14 - 15 years of age. These mammals are large in size, which in relation to the development of the baby elephant, the growth requires a lot of time. Under ideal conditions, a female elephant can produce an average of 12 calves over an ideal lifetime of 60 years, but not all calves survive to reproduce (Van Aarde 23). The findings in connection to the population growth of elephants highlights the need to stop the ivory trade and demand protective action.
            Alongside the previous reasons to save elephants from the ivory trade, elephants are brutally killed for their ivory, and their population has decreased drastically. Prior to European colonization, scientists believe that Africa may have held as many as 20 million elephants; by 1979 only 1.3 million remained (Mckenzie and Formanek).  An elephant ecologist, Mike Chase is the founder of Elephants Without Borders (EWB), and the lead scientist of the Great Elephant

Text Box: Table 1: Courtesy of Cable News Network

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/d-svZ0hNQiwnL2FohuNSwXX_Gfj_EpldcwJSWCqWqvjgPjMkGISEuUgdwhk_uJhSWOM2QnOVe0yf7w6Vie8qEBWZZi382wXwlHDZ4_1e7CKzV5ScEmWOojRriVe_VywOsQoVUKq5Census (GEC), which is a task to count the population of elephants in the entire African continent. He concluded (see table 1) that in the current year of 2016, there are 352,000 elephants in the African Savannah. Based on his research, he projects that there would be a future population of 160,000 elephants in the year 2025.
Cable News Network (CNN) journalists David Mckenzie and Ingrid Formanek reports drastic details in the words of Mike Chase, of a horrific moment while visiting the Linyanti Swamp in Botswana. Chase openly describes his thoughts on dead elephants while scoping lands where elephants live. He claims “I don't think anybody in the world has seen the number of dead elephants that I've seen over the last two years […] we spot an elephant lying on its side in the cracked river mud. But the acrid stench of death hits us before we even land. Up close, it is a horror” (Mckenzie & Formenek) Chase’s words clarifies that there are no myths on how elephants look after a poaching attack. The view can be devastating, and can negatively affect people who are fond of animals Text Box:           Image 1:  Courtesy of Cable News Network

such as himself.
acintosh HD:private:var:folders:k6:450v78cn6b10s1y89trld_ym0000gn:T:TemporaryImage 1 is from Cable News Network (CNN), which illustrates Mike Chase, an elephant ecologist overlooking a dead elephant laid to it’s side with the face hacked off. The background of the image shows a wildlife setting, and the discovery of the dead mammal was during the day, which allowed an easy distinction from this mammal being dead or sleeping. This image illustrates the explicit reality of what African elephants experience.
Government officials usually predominate and may enforce by the imposition of penalties, in order to save elephants from the ivory trade. Benard starr, a psychologist, college professor and a journalist, discusses in an article, on the involvement of governments in the destruction of ivory.
Governments are increasingly embracing this approach. In 2012 a Philadelphia dealer in African art was sentenced to 30 months in prison and fined $150,000 for smuggling in more than a ton of African ivory. In a get-tough initiative in 2013, China handed out three to fifteen-year prison sentences to at least twenty individuals involved in the illegal ivory market. In 2014, a Chinese antiques dealer was given a seventy-month prison sentence for smuggling rhinoceros horn and elephant ivory artifacts into China from the U.S. In its boldest action China sentenced 37 ivory smugglers to life terms.
In order for any drastic changes to occur in stopping ivory trade, the government in Africa and as well as any other country involved should be essentially included. To protect elephants, a New York State bill signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo on World Elephant day, August 12, 2014, bans the sale of ivory with few exceptions. Stringent proof will be required for allowing the sale of ivory that is one hundred years old or older (Starr). On July 6, 2016, a near-total ban on commercial trade in African elephant ivory went into effect in the United States. The information on the webpage is intended to provide guidance for those who wish to buy, sell, or otherwise trade in elephant ivory (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - International Affairs). The United States comprehends the dilemma in elephant population and the disturbing behavior of ivory poachers. Therefore, government officials should continue to propel a change for the elephant’s future and fight against extinction.
Saving elephants have become a major task for some wildlife organizations around the world. International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) is a good example of where to go if someone is interested in the action of conserving elephants. IFAW declares in a booklet of facts on elephants, “IFAW […] works to improve the welfare of wild and domestic animals throughout the world by reducing commercial exploitation of animals, protecting wildlife habitats, and assisting animals in distress. IFAW seeks to motivate the public to prevent cruelty to animals and to promote animal welfare and conservation policies that advance the wellbeing of [...] animals [...]” (Van Aarde 5). Wildlife conservation organizations work to stop the illegal poaching and trade of elephant ivory, protect wild elephant habitat and build natural sanctuaries for elephants to live freely. Supporting actively committed conservation efforts will have a positive impact on elephant preservation.
Leonardo DiCaprio is known as an American actor, film producer, and is the founder of the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation.  In 1998, he established his foundation to work on the most pressing environmental issues. This foundation works closely with conservation groups such as Save the Elephants and the Wildlife Conservation Network. The collaboration is to address the elephant ivory crisis by directing to anti-poaching, anti-trafficking and demand reduction.
Spreading the word about the dangers elephants face can assist in demand reduction of ivory throughout the world. In order to reduce demand for wildlife parts and products, which fuels illegal poaching and trafficking activities, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) conducts behavior change communication campaigns in countries that consume ivory. Through public outreach, IFAW educates consumers about the cruelty, conservation impact and illegality of wildlife trade. IFAW conducted a study in 2011 of an ivory demand reduction campaign in China, and resulted in effective reduction in purchases of ivory (International Fund for Animal Welfare). The beginning step in demand reduction as a consumer is to not buy ivory or other wildlife products. Be an elephant aware consumer.
On the contrary, the ivory market is thriving, regardless of the ban that prohibits the sale of ivory from elephants killed after 1989. The low – to middle – income young people in the United States and Asian countries see ivory jewelry and carvings as a status symbol (Morell). This demand is the reason why poachers are killing thousands of elephants a year, at an unsustainable rate. According to International Fund for Animal Welfare, An IFAW survey in China found that 70% of Chinese don’t know ivory comes from dead elephants. Many consumer of wildlife products are unaware of the cruelty actions of the ivory trade. When economic prosperity is high and people have little understanding of biodiversity, ivory markets flourish, therefore, demand reduction and educating consumers are important.
Although the ivory trade has been occurring for decades, it now threatens the future of African elephants, it is important to indicate why elephants need to be saved, who should save them and how to they can be saved. An important consideration for the future of elephants is to educate the young population about the consequences of poaching. The young population are the key to a better future for animals.














Works Cited

"All Wildlife (including Parts and Products) Imported into or Exported from the United States
for Any Purpose Must Be Declared to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement." U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - International Affairs. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2016.

Davidson, John. Elephants for Kids - Amazing Animal Books for Young Readers. N.p.: JD-Biz, 2013. Print.

"Defending Ivindo National Park - Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation." Leonardo DiCaprio
Foundation. N.p., 2015. Web. 09 Dec. 2016.

Larson, Elaine. The History of the Ivory Trade. National Geographic Society. 25 Feb.2013. National Geographic Society. <http://nationalgeographic.org/media/history-ivory-trade/>.
Mckenzie, David, and Ingrid Formanek. “Study Shows Tragic Drop in African
Elephants.” CNN. Cable News Network, 1 Sept. 2016. Web. 27 Nov. 2016. <http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/31/africa/great-elephant-census/>.

Morell, Virginia. "Recently Killed Elephants Are Fueling the Ivory Trade." Science | AAAS.
N.p., 2016. Web. 09 Dec. 2016.

Nast, Phil. "The African Elephant and The Ivory Trade." NEA. National Education
Association, n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2016.

"Reducing Demand for Wildlife Products." IFAW - International Fund for Animal Welfare. N.p.,
n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2016.

Rudi J Van Aarde. Elephants Facts and Fables. Southern Africa: Rudi J Van Aarde, n.d. PDF.

Starr, Bernad. “Destroying Ivory to save Elephants: Is It Working?” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 23 June 2016. Web. 27 Nov. 2016.

Turkalo, Andrea K., Peter H. Wrege, and George Wittemyer. "Slow Intrinsic Growth Rate
in Forest Elephants Indicates Recovery from Poaching Will Require Decades."
Journal of Applied Ecology (2016): 1-7. Web.

“Why Elephants Are Important - Save the Elephants.” Save the Elephants. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Nov. 2016. <http://savetheelephants.org/about-elephants-2-3/importance-of-elephants/>.



Thursday, December 8, 2016

Argumentative Report











To Be, or Not To Be...Alive: Euthanasia






















Leticia Rivera
Prof. Matyakubova
English 210
October 14, 2016




Abstract


Controversy continues to swirl around the issues of legalized euthanasia. Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person's life to relieve suffering. As many countries hesitate, legalization of euthanasia has significant potential risks, so it should not be legalized. The possible risks are danger of abuse, lack of implementation of safeguards, and decrease of palliative care. Euthanasia is legal in Oregon and contains substandard information; such as in 2014, 40% of people who requested euthanasia were concern about being a burden to their families. Oregon has also ignored the safeguard of seeking a psychiatrist for patients with depression who are seeking euthanasia. Palliative care is designed to help any physical, psychological, spiritual and existential suffering. This would allow for more clarification of why euthanasia is not legal is most parts of the world.








To Be, or Not To Be...Alive: Euthanasia



Jane Doe is 67 years old, and has advance stages of pancreatic cancer. She has recently suffered a stroke, and is no longer able to get off from the hospital bed. Her family is by her bedside, and all are discussing on what should be done to solve her suffering. Some family members are deciding euthanasia, as others are opposing to the idea. Euthanasia is one of the most pressing social concerns of our times and is defined as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). The etymology of euthanasia comes from the Greek word meaning, eu ‘well’ + thanatos ‘death’ (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). More importantly, euthanasia is also known as assisted suicide, in which a doctor is providing a lethal drug. There are a few basic arguments in favor of euthanasia, which are rights, mercy, and resources. Whereas, there are a few arguments against euthanasia, which is pressure on the elderly, undermines medical excellence, fear, and violates accepted codes of medical ethics. Euthanasia is legal only in the Netherlands, Belgium, Columbia, and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Canada, and a few states in the United States, which are Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Montana, and California (New Health Guide). However, as many countries hesitate, legalization of euthanasia has significant potential risks, so it should not be legalized. The possible risks are danger of abuse, lack of implementation of safeguards, and decrease of palliative care.
It is harmful to have the choice of when and how to die because it can lead to a danger of abuse, especially for vulnerable patients. The existence of legal assisted suicide and euthanasia puts pressure on vulnerable people. In Oregon, where assisted suicide is legal, 40% of people who requested legal assisted suicide cited concern about being a burden as a reason for their decision (Oregon Public Health Division 5). Since there is no other legal option, our society accepts it as even if it would cost others time, money and effort, the ill, disabled and elderly people need to be cared for until their natural death. If euthanasia and assisted suicide laws were passed, then being cared for would be optional. In such a hopeless situation, there may be a chance that even when patients do not want to die, caregivers might not want to look after them any more. The person could also feel that their death would save relatives time and effort, enabling them to go on with their busy lives. Consequently, the pressure from caregivers might propel patients to give up their life. It is difficult to be sure if the decision towards euthanasia is voluntary or forced by others. Humans have the right to live, and nobody should force anyone to die against a will under any circumstances.

Text Box: Figure 1: Courtesy of Minnesotans Against Assisted SuicideFigure 1 is from Minnesotans Against Assisted Suicide, which illustrates the statistics of assisted suicide patients in Oregon in 2014. On the Left side, the viewers notice a column of blue male and red female figures. On the right side, next to each pair of figures, the statistic reveals “40% feel like a “burden” on others, 97% were given lethal drugs without first receiving any psychiatric counseling, and 86% died without the prescribing physician present”. Sick patients in Oregon, who have made the decision to receive euthanasia, have either experienced a burden or didn’t follow any safeguard regulations, which connects us to the next risk.
The safeguards and controls for euthanasia are sometimes not closely inspected, and are not implemented. An important safeguard in Oregon is for patients with depression who are seeking euthanasia, would need to see a psychiatrist. Evidence has shown the safeguards are ignored and transgressed. Jose Pereira a medical student mentions in an article on illusions of safeguards and controls in Oregon:
In 2007, none of the people who died by lethal ingestion in Oregon had been evaluated by a psychiatrist or a psychologist, despite considerable evidence that, compared with non-depressed patients, patients who are depressed are more likely to request euthanasia and that treatment for depression will often result in the patient rescinding the request. In a study of 200 terminally ill cancer patients, for example, the prevalence of depressive syndromes was 59% among patients with a pervasive desire to die, but only 8% among patients without such a desire (3).
The evidence mentioned above demonstrates that Oregon ignored the safeguards. If the patients were treated for their depression, the choice of euthanasia could have been altered. When safeguards are not supervised, then euthanasia would be administered wrongfully. 
Correspondingly, palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives than euthanasia to help patients live in a pain-free life. There are many advanced technological devices and procedures which make it viable to increase the human life span and quality of life. Mary E. Harned a Staff Counsel for Americans United for Life discusses in a report, the outcomes of palliative care by indicating “Studies have revealed that when offered personal support and palliative care, most patients adapt and continue life in ways they might not have anticipated. Very few of these individuals ultimately choose suicide”(515). When good palliative care is provided to the patients, they may rarely want to end their lives. Palliative care is designed to help any physical, psychological, spiritual and existential suffering.
Text Box: Figure 2: Courtesy of Minnesotans Against Assisted Suicide

A common argument against this position is that terminal illnesses bring unbearable pain, which is the reason for euthanasia. Euthanasia quickly and humanely stops a patient’s suffering, allowing them to die with dignity. In this case, Brittney Marnard, a euthanasia advocate discusses in a documentary regarding dying with dignity “ The freedom of death with dignity, it exist because it is a choice. I chose this for myself, […] But my question is, who thinks they can sit there and tell me that I do not deserve this [euthanasia] choice”. Brittney demands it is a personal choice and a right to be able to decide when it is the right time to die, especially when one is suffering from a terminal illness. However, terminal is not always terminal. Sometimes developments in medicine allow their disease or condition to be treated, but not if they have already killed themselves. The Minnesotans Against Assisted Suicide uses an image (Figure 2) of Jeanette Hall, to display the positive reaction in not choosing to die. Along side of the image the organization stated “Jeanette Hall requested assisted suicide when she received a terminal diagnosis in 2000. Her doctor suggested treatment, and today she is cancer-free and happy she did not choose to die” (Minnesotans Against Assisted Suicide 4). Jeanette’s experience is an example of hope, she did not give up and now she is alive and well.
In brief, although many people are discussing the needs and benefits of euthanasia, legalization of euthanasia involves great potential of patient abuse, lack of implementation of safeguards, and decrease of palliative care. People on both sides of the debate care about suffering people and want to prevent intolerable suffering. The existence of legal assisted suicide and euthanasia puts pressure on vulnerable people, safeguards and controls not closely inspected. A far better response to human suffering would be to ensure the widespread availability of high quality palliative care. The option of euthanasia will lead to worse care for the dying, and perhaps even put pressure on loved ones and medical professionals who can no longer bear to see a patient suffer, or can no longer afford to treat their suffering. History has taught us the dangers of euthanasia and that is why there are only a few countries in the world today where it is legal. That is why almost all societies - even non-religious ones - for thousands of years have made euthanasia a crime














Works Cited


CompassionChoices. “Brittany Matnard’s Legacy: One Year Later.” Youtube. Youtube,
05 Oct. 2015. Web. 24 Oct. 2016 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzp0tp8Fzio>.

"Euthanasia." Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 23 Oct. 2016.          <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/euthanasia>.

Harned, Mary E. "The Dangers of Assisted Suicide No Longer Theoretical." 3.3 (2004):    58. Americans United for Life. Web. 23 Oct. 2016.

"Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act--2014." (n.d.): 1-6. Oregon Public Health Division.      Web. 23 Oct. 2016.

Pereira, J. "Legalizing Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide: The Illusion of Safeguards and         Controls." Current Oncology 18.2 (2011): n. pag. Web. 23 Oct. 2016.

“The Dangers of Assisted Suicide.” Minnesotans Against Assisted Suicide.2015. Web.     23 Oct. 2016.

"Where Is Euthanasia Legal?" New Health Guide. New Health Guide, 2014. Web. 23         Oct. 2016. <http://www.newhealthguide.org/Where-Is-Euthanasia-Legal.html>.